Plaintiff testified at deposition that his father-in-law was present
during all of his meeting with counsel and that plaintiff forwarded a fee
arrangement and progress invoices received from his counsel to his
father-in-law. The Court held that the
attorney-client privilege was waived because the presence of plaintiff’s
father-in-law was for support purposes as opposed to being necessary to
facilitate the attorney-client relationship. The Court also decided that federal
privilege law applied because plaintiff invokes federal question jurisdiction,
notwithstanding plaintiff’s supplemental state law claim under Ohio Revised
Code 4112.02. Moreover, the Court held that the the fee arrangement and
invoices were discoverable.
No comments:
Post a Comment